A Post-Transformational Study of Phrasal Possessive Constructions in English

Main Article Content

Abbas Fadhil Lutfi
Salih Ibrahim Ahmed

Keywords

possessive constructions, movement, government, binding, c-command

Abstract

This paper observes the three modules of government-binding (henceforth GB) theory which come into existence after transforming a syntactic string from D-structure to S-structure level. Transforming a syntactic structure via the process of movement leads to the appearance of a new structure, which is different from the original one at D-structure level. Here the focus is on the phrasal possessive constructions to which bounding (movement) theory, government theory, and binding theory are applied.


     The paper tries to provide a possible answer to the question of whether there is any relationship between the three post-transformational modules or not with respect to possessives. Also, and more importantly, it aims at indicating the extent to which possessives adhere to the modules. The paper is a theoretical one whose data is from textbooks and scholarly articles, rather than from participants. One of the outstanding conclusions is that the two modules of government theory and binding theory are highly intertwined due to sharing the structural relation of c-command.

Abstract 176 | PDF Downloads 96

References

References
Abney, S. (1987). The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Doctoral
dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Baltin, M. & Collins, C. (Eds.) (2001). The handbook of contemporary
syntactic theory. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Barker, C. (1998). Partitives, double genitives and anti-uniqueness. Natural
Language & Linguistic Theory 16 (pp. 679–717).
Bernstein, J. B. (2001). The DP hypothesis: identifying clausal properties in
the nominal domain. In M. Baltin & C. Collins (Eds.). The handbook of
contemporary syntactic theory (pp. 536-561). Malden: Blackwell
Publishing.
Büring, D. (2005). Binding theory. Cambridge: CUP.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht:
Foris Publications.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use.
New York: Praeger.
Coene, M. & D’hulst, Y. (2003). From NP to DP: the syntax and semantics
of noun phrases (vol. 1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Cook, V. J. & Newson, M. (2007). Chomsky’s universal grammar: an
introduction (3rd ed.). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Dixon, R. M. W. (2005). A semantic approach to English grammar (2nd
ed.). Oxford: OUP.
Fasold and J. Connor-Linton (Eds.), An introduction to language and
linguistics (pp. 97-135). Cambridge: CUP.
Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to government & binding theory (2nd
ed.). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Hawkins, J. A. (2004). Efficiency and complexity in grammar. Oxford:
OUP.
Johnson, K. (2004). Introduction to transformational grammar. University
of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Kayne, R. (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lang, E., Maienborn, C., & Fabricius-Hansen, C. (Eds.) (2003). Modifying
adjuncts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lightfoot, D. & Fasold, R. (2006). The structure of sentences. In R. W.
Fasold and J. Connor-Linton (Eds.), An introduction to language and
linguistics (pp. 97-135). Cambridge: CUP.
Lyons, C. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge: CUP.
Massam, D. (1993). The licensing of genitives. Linguistica Atlantica 15 (pp.
115-129).
Nguyen, A. (n.d.). An investigation of the double genitive’s. Massachusetts
Institute of Technology. (pp. 1-20). Retrieved from
http://docplayer.net/31248670-An-investigation-of-the-double-genitive-s.html
Partee, B. H. & Borschev, V. ( 2003). Genitives, relational nouns, and
argument-modifier ambiguity. In E. Lang, C. Maienborn, & C. Fabricius-
Hansen (Eds.). Modifying adjuncts (pp. 67-112). Berlin: Mouton de
Gruyter.
Puckica, J. (2013). The English possessives and the determiner v. pronoun
distinction. Cercles, 29 (pp. 67-97).
Radford, A. (2004). English syntax: an introduction. Cambridge: CUP.
Rozwadowska, B. (1988). Thematic restrictions on derived nominals. In
W. Wilkins, (Ed.). Thematic relations (pp. 147-165). San Diego:
Academic Press, Inc.
Taylor, J. R. (1996). Possessives in English: an exploration in cognitive
grammar. Oxford: OUP.
Uriagereka, J. (2008). Syntactic anchors on semantic structuring.
Cambridge: CUP.
van Riemsdijk, H., Koster, J., & H. van der Hulst (2004). Studies in
generative grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wilkins, W. (Ed.) (1988). Thematic relations. San Diego: Academic Press,
Inc.
Willemse, P. (2007). Indefinite possessive NPs and the distinction between
determining and nondetermining genitives in English. English Language
and Linguistics, 11 (pp. 537-568).