An Assessment of the Sociocultural Approach to Teaching Communication at Salahaddin University-Erbil (SUH)

Ali Mahmood Jukil, Heyder Sabir Hasan

Abstract


This study investigates the sociocultural theories; it tries to confirm the extent of the implementation of the sociocultural approach in teaching and learning communication in English language departments in College of Basic Education, College of Education and College of Languages at Salahaddin University-Hawler.  The participants are ninety-five students of the first and second grades of the three departments. This is to study and approve the implementation of the sociocultural approach. The sociocultural approach is the realization of the sociocultural theories. The main theories are mediation, zone of proximal development, regulations, verbal thought and activity theory. As well the preferred method of teaching according to the sociocultural approach is reciprocal teaching and the preferred method of learning is cooperative learning; that is to say, teaching and learning through social interactions that improve the processes of teaching and learning. Moreover, it enhances students’ thought, language and sociocultural competence. So the study is about social interactions and pedagogical implementations. It is to make the sociocultural approach to be realized by the teachers and students. Equally the methodology of the study is exploratory to confirmatory that is to say the sociocultural theories and approach are explored (investigated) and then confirmed in teaching and learning communication module. Also the method of researching is a questionnaire for students. It is carried out from the exploration of the sociocultural theories and approach of teaching and learning. Then the extent of the implementation of the sociocultural approach is confirmed via this tool, that the data is collected via the student’s perspectives. So the tool of data collection is aimed at the assessment of the sociocultural approach. On the other hand, Harvard style of citation and documentation is followed. 

The purpose of the study is to assess the degree of the implementation of the sociocultural approach, and to add something to the literature of the sociolinguistics and to the methods of teaching and learning. It is to see and assess the extent of teachers’ being familiar with the implementation of the sociocultural approach in the English language departments. The study hypothesizes that some of the assumptions of the sociocultural approach might be implemented in teaching and learning but it is not a methodical implementation. Although the sociocultural theories had been the basics of many modern approaches of teaching and learning because it is also can be called pragmatic approach and it is meaning seeker, and its assumptions are unconsciously are implemented by many teachers but some teachers might not be familiar with all its advantageous assumptions of teaching and learning that provides students’ learning outcomes. Also the implementation of the sociocultural approach provides teaching objectives and leaning outcomes.

The study consists of four sections; the first section includes the literature review in the field and the exploration of the sociocultural theories and the structure of the sociocultural approach. The second one is about the structure of the sociocultural approach. The third section explains the methodology of data collection and the criteria of the tools and presents the analysis of the data of the students’ questionnaire. And the last section deals with conclusions and recommendations. It can be concluded that the Sociocultural Approach is not familiarized enough and it is not completely and methodically implemented in teaching and learning communication in the English language departments. The inductive strategies are not enhanced adequately by the deductive ones; that is to say the individual students are not developed by their teachers. So the intrapersonal could not always and methodically develop by interpersonal in the classroom settings.  The classroom social relationships are not benefited sufficiently by cooperative techniques for classroom instructional interactions that develop the processes of assessment, teaching and learning to help students to acquire English Language sociocultural competence.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Blunden, A., and Schmolze, N., 2004. Mind and Society. by L. S. Vygotsky1930. [e-book] by Harvard University Press. Available at:

http://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/mind/index.htm [Accessed 26 April 2013].

Brown, H. D., 2001. Teaching by Principles- An Introduction to Language Pedagogy.2nd ed. San Francisco University. A Pearson Education Company.

Bunce, G. (n.d) Educational Implications of Vygotsky’s the Zone of Proximal Development on collaborative Work in the Classroom. [pdf] available at: http://blogs.ubc.ca/vygotsky/files/2013/11/vygotsky-and-the-classroom.pdf [Accessed 16 April 2014].

Burton, G. and Dimbleby, R., 2002. Teaching Communication. London and New York: Routledge.

Cole, M and Scribner, S., 1930. L.S. Vygotsky: Mind in Society. Transcribed: by Andy Blunden and Nate Schmolze. [e-book] available at:

http://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/mind/chap1.htm 2004/9/29.[Accessed 26 April 2013].

Cole, M. Jon-Steiner, V. Scribner, S. and Souberman, E. ed., 1978. L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Process. Ed, London: Harvard University press.

Cross, David R. 2007. Vygotsky: The ZoPeD & Scaffolding. Texas Christian University. [pdf] available at http://www.davidcross.us/classes/child/Scaffolding.pdf [accessed 1 May 2013]

Daniels, H. ed, 2003. Vygotsky and Pedagogy. London and New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library.

----------, 2005. An Introduction to Vygotsky. London & New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library.

----------, 2007. The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky. Ed. New York: Cambridge. [pdf] available at: www.cambridge.org/9780521831048. [Accessed 31-5-2013].

Daniels, H. ed., 1996. An introduction to Vygotsky. London and New York: Routledge.

Davydov V. V. and Kerr S. T., 1995. The Influence of L. S. Vygotsky on Education Theory, Research, and Practice. Educational Researcher. Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 12-21. Pub, American Educational Research Association Stable. [pdf] available at: http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp.[Accessed 27 April 2013].

Fernyhough, C., 2008. Getting Vygotskian about theory of mind: Mediation, dialogue, and the development of social understanding. Department of Psychology, Durham University Durham University, South Road, Durham: Department of Psychology. [pdf] Available at: www.sciencedirect.com [Accessed 16 July 2013].

Hall, J. K. and Verplaetse, L. S. eds., 2000. Second and Foreign Language Learning Through Classroom Interaction. [e-book] London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Available at: www.bookfi.org [Accessed 5 November 2013]

Hawkin, M. R., ed., 2004. Language Learning and Teacher Education: A Sociocultural Approach. Clevedon, Buffalo and Toronto: Cromwell Press Ltd Vole 2.

Hosseini, S. M. H.1991. Beyond the Present Methods and Approaches to ELT/Education: The Crucial Need for a Radical Reform. Tehran. Jungle Publication.

Hua Liu, C. and Matthews, R., 2005. Vygotsky’s philosophy: Constructivism and its criticisms examined. International Education Journal, 6(3), pp. 386-399. Shannon Research Press. http://iej.cjb.net [Accessed 4-5-2013].

Hua, Z., Seedhouse P., Wei, L. and Cook, V., eds., 2007. Language Learning and Teaching as Social Inter-Action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hymes, D.H., 1972. ‘’On Communicative Competence’’ In: J.B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds) Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 269-293.(Part 2) [pdf] available at http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/sgramley/Hymes-2.pdf [Accessed 4-7-2014].

Johnson, K. E. and Golombek, P. R., eds., 2011. Research on Second Language Teacher Education: A Sociocultural Perspective on Professional Development. New York and London: Routledge.

John-Steiner V. and Mahn H., 1996. Sociocultural Approach to Learning and Development: A Vygotskian Framework. Educational Psychologist, University of New Mexico: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 31(3/4), pp. 191-206 [pdf] available at: http://webpages.charter.net/schmolze1/vygotsky/johnsteiner.html [Accessed 10 July 2013].

Lantolf, J. P. and Thorne, S. L., 2006. Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. The Pennsylvania State University. [pdf] available at: http://old.fltrp.com/download/07041802.pdf. [Accessed November 2013]

Luria, A. (n.d). The problem of the cultural Behavior of the child. In: Van der Veer & jaan Valsiner, 1994. Vygotsky Reader. Ed. Oxford & Cambridge, Blackwell.

Larsen-Freeman, D., 2003. Techniques and Principles in Teaching. New York. Oxford University press.

Miller, J. Social Languages and Schooling: The Uptake of Sociocultural Perspectives in School. In: Hawkin, M. R., ed., 2004. Language Learning and Teacher Education: A Sociocultural Approach. Clevedon, Buffalo and Toronto: Cromwell Press Ltd Vole 2.

Minick, Norris. The development of Vygotsky’s thought: An introduction to Thinking and Speech. In: Daniels, H., ed., 2003. An introduction to Vygotsky. London and New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library, Routledge.

Moore, A., 2000.Teaching and Learning Pedagogy, Curriculum and Culture. London and New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library, Routledge.

Nilep, C., 2006. Code Switching” in Sociocultural Linguistics. Colorado Research in Linguistics. Vol. 19. Boulder: University of Colorado. [pdf] available at: http://www.colorado.edu/ling/CRIL/Volume19_Issue1/paper_NILEP.pdf [Accessed 17 September 2013].

Poehner, M. E. 2008. Dynamic Assessment: A Vygotskian Approach to Understanding and Promoting L2 Development. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA: Springer [pdf] available at: www.bookfi.org [Accessed 26 November 2013].

Reiber, R. W. & Carton, A S., eds., 1987. The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Scientific Legacy. Vole 1: Problems of general psychology. New York: Plenum Press.

Van der Veer, R. and Valsiner, J., 1994. The Vygotsky Reader. Oxford & Cambridge. Blackwell Publishers.

Van der Veer, R., 2011. Continuum Library of Educational Thought Series. Editor: Richard Bailey. Vole 10. Lev Vygotsky.

----------, L. S. Principles of social education for deaf and dumb children in Russia. In: Van der Veer, R. & Valsiner, j., 1994. Vygotsky Reader. Ed. Oxford & Cambridge, Blackwell.

Vygotsky. L.S.1986. Thought and Language. Translated from Russia by Kozulin, A. London: Cambridge.

---------, L. S. The problem of the cultural development of the child. In: Van der V. & jaan V., ed., 1994. Vygotsky Reader. Oxford & Cambridge: Blackwell.

Vygotsky. L.S.1986, L. (n.d) Social Development Theory.

http://www.instructionaldesign.org/theories/social-development.html [Accessed 1 May 2013].

Williams, M. and Burden, R. L., 1997. Psychology for language Teachers: a Social Constructivist Approach. Cambridge: University press.

Willis, J., 2009. Assessment for learning: a sociocultural approach. In: Proceedings of: Changing climates: Education for sustainable futures. [pdf] available at: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/29323 [Accessed 13 October 2013].

Anon (n.d). Interactive Techniques. [pdf] available at:

http://www.fctl.ucf.edu/teachingandlearningresources/coursedesign/assessment/content/101_tips.pdf [Accessed 30 December 2013].


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Department of Scientific Publication Office:  The Central Library of Salahaddin University-Erbil, Kirkuk Road, Erbil, Kurdistan, Iraq. Phone:+964 (0)66 2580274, email: zanco.humanity@su.edu.krd. www.su.edu.krd, www.zancojournals.su.edu.krd 

Copyright and Reprint Permission: It is the policy of ZANCO to own the copyright to the technical contributions it publishes and to facilitate the appropriate reuse of this material by others. Photocopying is permitted with credit to the source for individuals for individual use. All ZANCO Journals are Open Access Journals.

Copyright © 2015 . All Rights Reserved. Salahaddin University - Erbil