Hedged Performatives in English Political Debates
Political speeches have been dealt with from different angles from a long time. They have been regarded as an important part of rhetoric. Politicians or other public persons often use rhetorical devices to convey their thoughts and ideas. They have goals set in order to convince their listeners and persuade them to elect him/her. This is done through different linguistic devices like hedged performatives, which are the main concern of the paper. The paper aims at investigating the use of Hedged Performatives in political debate and knowing the effect of gender differences in using the devices and the most frequently used ones as well. To meet the aims of the paper, the final presidential debate between Clinton and Trump is selected and analysed. Depending on the results analysed, a number of points are found out as: probability is the main concern of the debate where no certainty is predicted from their speech, and most of the devices are used by Clinton more than Trump. Finally, at the end of the paper a list of references is presented.
The American Heritage College Dictionary. (2004). 4th ed. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Archer D, Aijmer K. and Wichmann, A. (2012). Pragmatics: An advanced Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.
Behnam, B. and Khaliliaqdam, S. (2012). “A Cross Cultural Study on Hedging Devices in Kurdish Conversation”. Acta Linguistica Asiatica. Vol.2. No. 1, 2012. Available at: https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/ala/article/view/115. [Accessed 18 Dec.2017].
Blake, A. (2016). The Final Trump-Clinton debate transcript, annotated. The Washington Post [online]. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/19/the-final-trump-clinton-debate-transcript-annotated/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.eef4fdf011fe [Accessed 22, December 2016].
Bloor, M. and Bloor, T. (2007). The Practice of Critical Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. London: Hodder Arnold.
Cruse, A. (2006). A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Danet, F. (1978). Courtroom questioning: a sociolinguistic perspective. In: Massery, L. (Ed.), Psychology and Persuasion in Advocacy, Washington, D.C., Association of Trial Lawyers of America, National College of Advocacy, pp. 412-441.
Fraser, B. (1975). Hedged Performatives in Cole and Morgan, (eds.). Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp.187–210.
………… (1980). Mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics 31, pp341-350.
…………. (2010). “Hedging in Political Discourse: The Bush 2007 Press Conferences”. Available at: http://www.bu.edu/sed/files/2010/10/2010-Hedging-in-Political-Disciourse-The-2007-Bush-Press-Conferences.pdf. [Accessed 13 Jan 2016].
Greenbaum, S. (1992). The Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grundy, P. (2008). Doing Pragmatics (3rd ed.). London: Hodder Education. P.299.
Halliday, M. and Hasan R. (1989). Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Itani, R. (1995). Semantics and Pragmatics of Hedges in English and Japanese. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. University College London: London
Jucker, A. and Taavitsainen, I. (ed.). (2008). Speech Acts in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamn’s Publishing Company.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leech et al (2001). An A – Z of English Grammar and Usage. London: Pearson Education Limited.
Pelly, E. (2013). Hedging in Political Discourse: An Analysis of Hedging in an American City Council.
Quirk, R. Greenbaum, S. Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (1985). Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Rabab’ah, G. and Abu Rumman, R. (2015). “Hedging in Political Discourse: Evidence from the Speeches of King Abdullah II of Jordan”. Prague Journal of English Studies. Vol. 4, No. 1, 2015. Available at: https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/pjes.2015.4.issue-1/pjes-2015-0009/pjes-2015-0009.pdf. [Accessed 9 May 2017].
Salager-Meyer, Francoise. 1995. “I think that perhaps you should: A study of hedges in written scientific discourse.” The Journal of TESOL 2 (2): 127–143.
Thao, V. (2011). Hedged Performatives in English and Vietnamese – A Contrastive Analysis. Unpublished MA Thesis in English Language, College of Foreign Languages, Danang University. Available at: http://tailieuso.udn.vn/bitstream/TTHL_125/1058/2/Summary.pdf. [Accessed 23 Sep. 2017].
Varttala, T. (2001). Hedging in Scientifically Oriented Discourse Exploring Variation According to Discipline and Intended Audience. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Tampere University.
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Watts, R. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yule, G. (2006). The Study of Language. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Copyright (c) 2019 Kavi Shakr Mohammed, Nyan Kamil Ghafour
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
At Zanco Journal, we're dedicated to protecting your rights as an author, and ensuring that any and all legal information and copyright regulations are addressed. Whether an author is published with Zanco Journal or any other publisher, we hold ourselves and our colleagues to the highest standards of ethics, responsibility and legal obligation