A Speech Act Analysis to the Utterances of the Animated Cartoon Series: The Adventures of Tintin

  • Shaymaa Heider Kareem College of Basic Education/ Salahaddin University-Erbil
  • Salam N. Bakir College of Basic Education- Salahaddin University-Erbil
Keywords: Animated Cartoon Series, Verbal Communication, Speech Act Theory

Abstract

The current study concerns with speech acts produced by two selected characters’ utterances in the series ‘The Destination Moon’ and ‘Explorers on the Moon’. The study aims to explore the intended meanings of both characters Tintin's and Captain's utterances in verbal communication. It also explores how animated cartoon series is analyzed and to what extent the speech act theory proposed by Searle (1969) can apply to the utterances of the animated cartoon series ‘The Destination Moon’ and ‘Explorers on the Moon’ in ‘The Adventures of Tintin’. The study uses exploratory sequential mixed-methods for analyzing utterances. The researcher collects data from an audiovisual series. The study uses the model of Searle’s (1969) speech act theory. The first result of this study indicate that the characters used direct and indirect speech acts in the series. The second result of this study is Assertives category, the more prominent illocutionary acts (ILAs) in the series has ranged 46%. Besides, the directives category is second ILAs which is 37% and followed by expressives, commissives and declaratives. The third result of this study is that the utterances of both characters used the satisfaction rule for performing effective speech acts. This study is expected to give some useful insights into understanding what speech acts are in the animated cartoon series.

References

1- Akmajian, A. A., Dermers, R. A., Faemer, A. K., Harnish, R. M. (2010) Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication. 6th ed.USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
2- Akhutina, T.V. (2003) Theory of Verbal Communication in The Works of M.M. Bakhtin and L.S.Vygotsky, Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, vol. 41, (nos. ¾ ), p.110.
3- Al-Sulaimaan, M. M.D. (2010) Semantics and Pragmatics.2nd ed. Mosul: Daar Ibn Al-Atheer press.
4- Austin, J. L. (1962) How To Do Things With Words. London: Oxford University Press, p.12.
5- Birner, B.J. (2013) Introduction to Pragmatics. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
6- Brennenstuhl, W., Ballmar, T. T, Levelt,W. J.M.(eds) (1981) Speech Act Classification: A Study in The Lexical Analysis of English Speech Activity Verbs. New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Vol.8.
7- Cruse, A. (2000) Meaning in Language: An introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
8- Cruse, A. (2006) A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
9- Cumming, L. (2005) Pragmatics: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
10- Cutting, J. (2002) Pragmatics and Discourse. London and New York: Routledge publication Taylor and Francis Group.
11- Emezue, G. (2013) A Pragma-Sociolinguistic Interpretation of Cartoons As Visio-Verbal Communication, Geelong, 2012, VI World Congress on Communication and Arts: COPEC.
12- Finch, G. (2000) Linguistic Terms and Concepts. New York: Palgrave Publishers Ltd, p.183.
13- Harnish, R. M., Bach, K. (1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, London: MIT Press.
14- Huang, Y., Milroy, L., Brown, K., Eve, V., Clark, McMahon, A., Miller, J. (2007) Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press, p.107.
15- Isnawati, F., Anam, S.,Diana, D. (2015) Speech Acts Analysis of The Main Character in Shrek Movie Script, Fakultas Sastra Universitas Jember, Vol.(1), pp. 60-64.
16- Kaburise , P. (2011) Speech Act Theory and Communication: A Univen Study. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, p.80.
17- Kinyua, J. W. (2014) Decoding Cartoons: The Explicatures and Implicatures of Editorial Cartoons in the Daily Nations. Beng thesis: University of Nairobi.
18- Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1996) Social Psychological Models of Interpersonal Communication. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.). Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 655-701). New York: Guilford Press.
19- Kristani, M. (2013) Directive Speech Act in the Movie ‘Sleeping Beauty’, Humaniora, 4(2), pp. 949-966.
20- Leech, G., N. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London, New York: Longman Group Limited, pp.105-110.
21- Levinson, S., C. (1983) Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22- Lyons, J. (1977) Semantics. London, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
23- Mey, J. L. (1993) Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford, UK & Cambridge, USA: Blackwell Publishers, p.164.
24- Mey, J. L. (2009) Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. 2nded. The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier Ltd., p.995-996.
25- Muhartoyo, K. K. (2013) Directive Speech Act in The Movie “SLEEPING BEAUTY”. BINUS University: Humaniora.Vol.4 No.2.
26- Nugroho, A., S. (2011) An Analysis of Illocutionary Acts in Sherlock Holmes Movie. BEng thesis: University Syarif Hidayatulla. Jakarta.
27- Osika, G., (2008) The Communicative Acts As Actions, Google scholar [online].Available at: https://scholar.google.pl/citations?user=UBcL3bMAAAAJ&hl=pl (accessed:11th February 2018).
28- Petrus, K. (2010) Meaning and Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan: London , New York.
29- Saeed, J., L. (2009) Semantics. 3rd ed. Malden, Oxford, West Sussex: Black well Ltd.
30- Saputro, E., P., N. (2015) The Analysis of Illocutionary Acts of Jokowi’s Speeches. Beng thesis: Santa Dharma University.
31- Searle, J. R. (1969) Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 16, pp.24-25, pp.57-61.
32- Searle, J. R. (1979).Expression and Meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press, p.12, pp.13-14, pp.30.
33- Sent, G. (2014) Understanding Pragmatics. London, New York: Rutledge Taylor& Francis Group, p.26.
34- Smith, B. (2003) John Searle. Edinburgh,New York: Cambridge University Group.
35- Vanderveken & kubo. (2001) Essay in Speech Act Theory. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co. p. 33.
36- Ward, G. & Horn, L. R. (2006) The Hand Book of Pragmatics. Malden, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
37- Wells, P. (1998) Understanding Animation. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis, p.11.
38- Yule, G. (1996b) Pragmatics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
39- Yule, G. (2010). The Study of Language.4thed .Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Published
2019-09-19
How to Cite
1.
Kareem S, Bakir S. A Speech Act Analysis to the Utterances of the Animated Cartoon Series: The Adventures of Tintin. JAHS [Internet]. 19Sep.2019 [cited 10Dec.2019];23(4):322 -341. Available from: http://zancojournals.su.edu.krd/index.php/JAHS/article/view/2878
Section
Articles