Wh-Movement in Central Kurdish: A Cross-linguistic Study
This paper looks into wh-movement in Central Kurdish ( henceforth CK) and its position with relation to the available parameters by comparing it with some other languages. The data of the study is collected based on the fact that the author is the native speaker of the language under study. The method of the data analysis is within the Generative Framework. A superficial look into the status of wh-phrases in CK did not render a decisive result. Since wh- phrases (both wh arguments and wh adjuncts) may sit in situ, i.e. having the same position as their corresponding arguments in the affirmative sentences. Wh-phrase fronting to Spec of Focus Phrase is allowed and in this case the phrase receives contrastive interpretation. The data demonstrates that Wh-phrases in a Wh–in-situ examples is not an instant of movement in Logical form after spell out. The evidence of non-occurrence of wh-movement in LF comes from violation of subjacency. The wh-operator aya is base generated in Specifier of Complementizer Phrase (CP) and the wh-feature moves up to Complementizer to be in agree relation with the operator.
-----------. 2009. Wh in Situ, from the 1980s to Now. Language and Linguistics Compass. 3/3: 769-791.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist program. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam and Lasnik, Howard. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In Syntax: an international handbook of contemporary research. von Stechow, J. Jacobs A., Sternefeld, W. & Vennemann, T. (eds.). Berlin: De Gruyter. Reprinted in: The minimalist program, ch.1. Chomsky 1995, 13-127. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Fattah, Muhammed. 1997. Generative Grammar of Kurdish. Ph.D., University of Amsterdam.
Huang, James. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Ph.D. , Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Karimi, Simin. 1999. Is Scrambling as strange as we think it is? MIT working Papers in Linguistics 33: 159-180.
--------- and Taleghani, Azita. 2007. ‘ Wh-movement, interpretation, and optionality in Persian’. IN S. Karimi , V. Sammiian, W. Wilkins (eds) Clausal and Phrasal Architecture: Syntactic derivation and Interpretation. Amsterdam. John Benjamins. 167-187.
McDaniel, Dana. 1989. ‘Partial and Multiple Wh-movement’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 7:565-604.
Raghibdust, Shahla. 1994. ‘Multiple Wh-fronting in Persian.’ Cashiers de Linguistitique. 21:27-58.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs). Cambridge, The MIT Press.
Santorini, Beatrice and Anthony Kroch. 2007. The Syntax of Natural language: An Online introduction usingthe tree Program. https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~beatrice/syntax-textbook/index.html.
Taleghani, Azita. 2003. Persian Wh-Construction: A Case of F- Selection versus C-Selection. Ms. University of Arizona.
Toth, Ildiko. 1999. ‘negative Polarity Item Licensing in Hungarian’ Acta Linguistica Hungarica 46 (1-2): 119-142.
Wahba, wafaa. 1984. Wh- Construction in Egyptian Arabic. Ph.D., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Watanabe, Akira. 1992. ‘ Subjacency and S-Structure movement of Wh-in situ.’ Journal of East Asian Linguistics.1:255-291.
--------- 2001. ‘ Wh-in situ Languages.’ In M. baltin and C. Collins (eds). The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 203-225.
Yeo, Norman. 2010. Unifying Optional Wh-movement. Ph.D., University of York.
Copyright (c) 2019 Twana Saadi Hamid
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
At Zanco Journal, we're dedicated to protecting your rights as an author, and ensuring that any and all legal information and copyright regulations are addressed. Whether an author is published with Zanco Journal or any other publisher, we hold ourselves and our colleagues to the highest standards of ethics, responsibility and legal obligation