Effect of Sowing Dates and Two Chickpea Cultivars on Some Growth Parameters and Yield

Main Article Content

Raad H. Salih
Sumaya A. Abdullah
Bilal I. Mohammed

Keywords

chickpea cultivars, growth parameters, sowing date, yield .

Abstract

Abstract


A field study was conducted at Grdarasha Research Station of the College of Agriculture/ Salahaddin University– Erbil, during the growing season of 2017, to study the effect of sowing date on some growth parameters and yield of chickpea. A factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design (RCBD), with three replicates was used, sowing dates ( January 20, February 9, March 1, and March 21 ), and two cultivars of chickpea (Rafidain and Gab) were implemented. Sowing at January, 20 produced the highest plant height (43.0 cm), leaf area (797.83 cm2), leaf area index (2.66), dry matter (38.06 g m-2), crop growth rate (7.90 g m-2 day-1), number of primary branches plant-1 (3.55), number of pod plant-1 (21.60) and seed yield (2.160 t ha-1). On the contrary sowing at March, 21 recorded the lowest of all above studied characteristics, also Gab cultivar surpassed the Rafidain cultivar in all characteristics studied except no. of seeds plant-1 and 100-seed weight. From interaction sowing date with cultivars recorded the highest of all characteristics studied at sowing date January, 20 with Gab cultivars as well as Rafidain cultivar recorded the lowest of all studied characteristics at sowing date March, 21. There was positive highly significant correlation(r= 0.869) between seed yield and their components; no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1 and 100- seed weight (r= 0.869, r= 0,810 and r= 0.706) respectively.

Abstract 18 | pdf Downloads 23

References

References:
Chaitanya, S. K and Chandrika (2006). Response of chickpea genotype to different date of sowing in alligols of chittor district. Andhra Pradesh, India. Int. chickpea and pigeonpea Newsletter,10: 8-9.
De Bei R,; Fuentes S,; Gilliham M,; Tyerman S,; Edwards E,; Bianchini N.; Smith J and Collins C. 2016. VitiCanopy: a free computer app to estimate canopy vigor and porosity for grapevine. Sensors 2016,16, 585.
Dixit, J. P., P. V. A. Pillai and K. N. Namdeo (1993).Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to sowing date and irrigation schedule. Indian J. Agron., 38 (1): 121-123.
Eberhort, S. A. and W. A. Russel (1966).Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci., 6: 36-40.
Fallah, S. (2008).Effects of sowing date and density on yield and its components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes under dryland conditions of Khorram-Abad. Persian J. Sci. Tech. Agric. Natural Resources. 12 (45): 123-136.
Haloi, B and B. Baldev (1986). Effect of irrigation on growth attributes in chickpea, when grown under different dates of sowing and population pressure. Indian J. Pl. Physiol., 29 (1): 14-27.
Kaya, H., Arif, S. and Muhammet, T. (2010). Effect of sowing dates and seed treatments on yield, some yield parameters and protein content of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) African J. of Biotechnology, 9(25): 3833-3839.
Kumar, Sunil ; R. K. Pannu, A. K. Dhaka; B, Singh and K. D. Sharma (2013). Effect of irrigation levels on growth and yield of Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Ann. Agric. Bio. Res.,18(1): 29-31.
Mahse, L. B., D. V. Beshmukh and B. M. Jamadagni (2006). Varietal improvement of chickpea for rainfed and late sown conditions. Ann. Pl. Physiol., 20 (2) : 177-180.
Malik, S. P., H. L. Ghadge and A. S. Jadhav (1995).Contribution of production parameters to yield of chickpea under dryland condition. Indian J. Agron., 40 (1): 111-113.
Mansur, C. P., Y. B. Palled, S. I. Halikatti, M. B. Chetti and P. M. Salimath (2010). Pattern of leaf area, canopy width and dry matter production in chickpea as influenced by dates of sowing and irrigation levels. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 23 (4): (635-637).
O'Toole N.F.L.; Stoddard O'Brien, L. (2001). Screening of chickpea for adaptation to autumn sowing. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 186(3):193-207.
Perkins, J. M. and J. L. Jinks (1968).Environmental and genotype environmental components of variability. Heredity 23: 339-356.
Reddy, N. R. N. and I. P. S. Ahlawat (1998).Response of chickpea genotypes to irrigation and fertilizer under late sown conditions. Indian J. Agron., 43 (1): 95-101.
Rehman, H.; Rafi Q.; Atique, R.; Farhan, A.;Jamshaid, Q.; Muhammad, S. and Shah, N. (2015).Effect of Different Sowing Dates on Growth and Grain Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cultivars under Agro-environment of Taluka Dokri Sindh, Pakistan. American Journal of E. A., 8(1): 46-53.
SAS (2005).Statistical Analysis System. SAS institute Inc., NC, USA. Release 82.
Schwenke, G. D.; M. B. Peoples; G. L.Turner and D. F. Herridge. (1998). Doses nitrogen fixation of commercial, dryland chickpea and faba bean crops in north-west New south wales maintain or enhance soil nitrogen. Aust, J. Ex, Agric., 38: 61-70.
Steel R.G.H.; Torrie J. H.;Dicky D.A. (1997). Principles and procedures of statistics.A biometrical approach. 3rd Ed. McGraw Hill, Inc. Book Co. N.Y.,352-358.
Stieller, R. M.; G. D. Hill and B. A. Kenzieb. (1994).Evaluating new chickpea genotypes in Cantebury. Proceedings of Annual Conference - Agron Society of New Zealand, 24: 63-66.
Virk, H. K. Guriqbal, Singh and H. S. Sekhon (2005). Effect of time of sowing on the productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties, J. Res., PAU, 42(2): 148-149.
Yadav, V. S.; S. S. Yadav; J. D. S. Singh and D. Panwar. (1999). Morpho-physiological basis of yield varieties in chickpea under late sowing conditions, Ann. Agric. Res., 20 (2): 227-230.Yadav, V. S., S. S. Yadav, J. KuMarch and D.
YucelD, Anlarsal AE. (2008). Performance of some winter chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes in Mediterranean conditions. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj- Napoca.,36(2):35-41.