Main Article Content
Nishteman Square, Successful Square, Quality of social life factors, and square design factors
Nowadays there is an increasing understanding to the importance of the public open space and to the green open spaces infrastructure, which works on providing vital environmental services for the users, so it considered as the main attraction point in every city.
One of these significant spaces is; Public squares which functions as one of the most important open spaces where people can have exhibited many activities and events in the city. For that, the ‘life’ of squares evolves and changes according to the contemporary demands of its users and their city cause ,each square has its own characteristics that identified it from other ones due to its relation with the local culture identity, all that have to connect strongly within the evolution of Neshteman Square, this study aims to analyses and explained the most important diversity factors that could effect on the usability of these spaces, how its designs effect the accommodation (to stay) of these spaces within people, for that the study employs spatial analysis to show the assessment of the square’s physical design characteristics with people’s different activities, which effect the social side of the users. This study will focus on one of the important spaces in Erbil city due to its location to one of the most important icons in our city (the Citadel), this will give the square a special identity and relative design factors should be respected.The findings reveal that square in order to be a successful open space it have to work on applying diversity of service that have a great impact on attracting people in it and use at all the day, safety within a good looking landscaping and daily maintenance defiantly will give the impression to people to stay, helping in that the diversity of function and services surrounding the square edge will give a very high level of vitality to both the square itself as well as the people in this important liveliness space.
2. Achmad D., N., and W., Z., Public Open Space Privatization and Quality of Life, Case Study Merdeka Square Medan., ASEAN Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies, Savoy Homann Bidakara Bandung Hotel, Bandung, Indonesia, 15-17 June, AcE-Bs Bandung., Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 36., 466 – 475., www.sciencedirect.com, 2012.
3. Barbara G.,Darby W., gehl architects, public Spaces & Public Life., City of Seattle/Department of Planning and Development/Seattle Department of Transportation, Green Futures & Design University of Washington/College of Built,Environments.www.ISISeattle.org., Contact: Todd Vogel, info@ISISeattle.org, 2009.
4. Boris Johnson., Open Space Strategies, Best Practice Guidance, A Joint Consultation Draft by the Mayor of London and CABE Space, Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA, www.london.gov.uk., September., 2008.
5. Boyce, P. R., Eklund, N. H., Hamilton, B. J., & Bruno, L. D. (2000). Perceptions of safety at night in different lighting conditions. Lighting Research and Technology, 32(2), 79e91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/096032710003200205.
6. Capital Spaces 2012., A Design Guide for London’s Public Spaces., Capital Spaces – A Design Guide for London’s Public Spaces, Bartlett School of Planning, UCL, Spring Term, Module coordinator: Prof. Matthew Carmona., Module tutors: Wendy Clarke, Sonia Freire Trigo., Collaborators: Urban Design Skills., 2012.
7. Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S., Public Places Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Oxford: Architectural Press, 2003
8. Hossein S., Fataneh F.,M., Syntactical analysis of the accessibility and sociability of a square in the Kuala Lumpur City Center, Department of Architecture, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran School of Graduate Studies and Technical Complex, Islamic Azad University of Rasht Branch, Lahijan 44158-84715, Iran., Available online at www.sciencedirect.com., Frontiers of Architectural Research., www.keaipublishing.com/foar., Frontiers of Architectural Research (2017) 6, 456–468., 2017.
9. Jack L. Nasar, Saleheh Bokharae. Lighting modes and their effects on impressions of public squares, Journal of Environmental Psychology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jep., Journal of Environmental Psychology 49., 2017 96e105).
10. Juliana Furlaneto Benchimol , Ana Paula do Nascimento Lamano-Ferreira, Mauricio Lamano Ferreira, Tatiana Tucunduva Philippi Cortese, Heidy Rodriguez Ramos., Decentralized management of public squares in the city of São Paulo, Brazil: Implications for urban green spaces., Contents lists available at Science Direct Land Use Policy.journalhomepage:www.elsevier.com/locate/landusepol.,UniversidadeNovedeJulhoUNINOVEAvenidaFranciscoMatarazzo,612,ÁguaBranca,SãoPaulo,SP,05001-100Brazil.,LandUsePolicy63, 2017.
11. Kallus, Rachel (2001) From Abstract to Concrete: Subjective Reading of Urban Space. Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 6, No. 2, 129.
12. Khalilah Zakariya, Nor Zalina Harun, Mazlina Mansor, Spatial Characteristics of Urban Square and Sociability:A review of the City Square, Melbourne “Quality of Life in the Built & Natural Environment” AicQoL2014Kota Kinabalu AMER International Conference on Quality of Life The Pacific Sutera Hotel, Sutera Harbour, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia 4-5 January 2014.
13. Larry D., Plaza Design Guidelines, City of Vancouver Land Use and Development Policies and Guidelines Community Services, 453 W. 12th Ave Vancouver, BC V5Y 1V4 F 604.873.7344 fax 873.7060 email@example.com., Adopted by City Council November 17, 1992.
14. M. Zawidzki, “Automated geometrical evaluation of a plaza (town square)”, Department of Architecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,77 Massachusetts Ave.7 304G, Cambridge, MA02139, USA journalhomepage:www.elsevier.com/locate/advengsoft, 2016.
15. Madanipour, A. (1999) Why Are the Design and Development of Public Spaces Significant for Cities, Environment and Planning B; Planning and Design, 26 (6).
16. Mariani, L., Parisi, S.G., Cola, G., Lafortezzza, R., Colangelo, G., Sanesi, G., 2016.Climatological analysis of the mitigating effect of vegetation on the urban heat island of Milan,Italy. Sci. TotalEnviron.569–570,762–773).
17. McColl, L., 2002. Making spaces places: creative activities can make idle public spacesengagingcentresofciviclife.Alternat.J.28(3).
18. Nor Zalina H., Khalilah Z., Mazlina M., Khairunnisa Z., “Determining Attributes of Urban Plaza for Social Sustainability”., AicQoL2014 Kota Kinabalu AMER International Conference on Quality of Life. The Pacific Sutera Hotel, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia,4-5January 2014 "Quality of Life in the Built and Natural Environment Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 153 (2014) 606 – 615,Available online at www.sciencedirect.com.
19. Project for Public Spaces, Squares. Retrieved December 14, 2014: http://www.pps.org/squares/.
20. Pugalis, L., Achieving place quality. Urban Des. 109, 14–15., C., 2004. Space syntax: some inconsistencies. Environ: Plan. Des., 2009.
21. Report On Consultancy Study On Public Open Space in Private Developments [Pospd]., Development Bureau, Rocco Design Architects Ltd. School of Architecture, Cuhk Land Elite Surveyors Ltd.
22. Town Centre Design Guidelines, City of White Rock, Urban Forum associates, Perry + Associates, Landscape Architecture, Site Planning, September, 2011.
23. Urban Design Principles and Development Guidelines., Garrett Square Revitalization Strategy Prepared for the Garrett Square Economic Development Corporation by Urban Design Center of Northeast Ohio, July 2004.
24. Urban Squares, Development Type-Urban Squares., Healthy spaces & places. www.healthyplaces.org.au., funded by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing., 29 May, 2009.