Determining Casagrande Liquid Limit Values from Cone Penetration Test Data

  • Hawkar Hashim Ibrahim Department of Civil ,College of Engineering ,Salahaddin University-Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
  • Krikar M-Gharrib Noori Krikar M-Gharrib Noori1,Koya Technical Institute,Erbil Polytechnic University,Koya,KRG-Iraq
Keywords: Liquid limit; Casagrande apparatus; Cone penetration.

Abstract

The liquid limit (LL) is one of the essential geotechnical parameter for fine-grained soils. Commonly, two approaches, named Casagrande apparatus and cone penetrometer methods are used to determine the liquid limit of soils. The liquid limits of 41 soil samples in Erbil province, Kurdistan region, Iraq, were found based on cone penetrometer (30°/80g cone, using 20 mm penetration) and Casagrande apparatus methods. The study compares the liquid limit values determined by both methods. The results indicated that the liquid limits obtained by the Casagrande cup method (LLcup) are lower than those from fall cone method (LLcone). Finally, an equation for determining LLcup was proposed based on LLcone values and it compared to the previously suggested equations.

References

ASTM D2487. (2017). Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM Internationa.
ASTM D4318. (2017). Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM Internationa.
Belviso, R., Ciampoli, S., Cotecchia, V., & Federico, A. (1985). Use of the cone penetrometer to determine consistency limits. Ground Engineering, 18(5).
Bicalho, K., Gramelich, J., & dos Santos Cunha, C. (2014). Comparison between Casagrande cup and cone penetrometer test for determining liquid limit of different Brazilian clays. Comunicações Geológicas, 101, 1097-1099.
BS 1377-2:1990. (2010). Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes - Part 2: Classification Test. UK: British Standards Institution.
Budhu, M. (1985). The effect of clay content on liquid limit from a fall cone and the British cup device. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 8(2), 91-95.
Casagrande, A. (1932). Research on the Atterberg limits of soils. Public roads, 13(8), 121-136.
Casagrande, A. (1948). Classification and identification of soils. Transactions, ASCE, 113, 901-991.
Casagrande, A. (1958). Notes on the design of the liquid limit device. Géotechnique, 8(2), 84-91.
Di Matteo, L. (2012). Liquid limit of low-to medium-plasticity soils: comparison between Casagrande cup and cone penetrometer test. Bulletin of engineering geology and the environment, 71(1), 79-85.
Dragoni, W., Prosperini, N., & Vinti, G. (2008). Some observations on the procedures for the determination of the liquid limit: an application on Plio-Pleistocenic clayey soils from Umbria region (Italy). Ital J Eng Geol Environ Spec(1), 185-197.
Fojtová, L., Marschalko, M., Franeková, R., & Kovář, L. (2009). Study of compatibility of methods for liquid limit measurement according to Czech State Standard and newly adopted European Standard.
Grønbech, G. L., Nielsen, B. N., & Ibsen, L. B. (2010). Comparison of plasticity index of Søvind marl found by use of Casagrande cup, fall cone apparatus and loss on ignition. Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, DCE Technical Reports, 87, 14.
Grønbech, G. L., Nielsen, B. N., & Ibsen, L. B. (2011). Comparison of liquid limit of highly plastic clay by means of Casagrande and Fall Cone Apparatus. Age (mil. Years), 40, 46.
Hanks, A. (1981). Measurement of the liquid limit of soils using the cone penetration method: The Office.
Hrubesova, E., Lunackova, B., & Brodzki, O. (2016). Comparison of Liquid Limit of Soils Resulted from Casagrande Test and Modificated Cone Penetrometer Methodology. Procedia Engineering, 142, 364-370. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.02.063
ISO, C. (2015). TS 17892-12 (2004) Geotechnical investigation and testing—Laboratory testing of soil—Part 12: Determination of Atterberg limits. European Committee for Standardization.
Karlsson, R. (1961). Suggested improvements in the liquid limit test, with reference to flow properties of remoulded clays. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.
Karlsson, R. (1977). Consistency limits: A manual for the performance and interpretation of laboratory investigations. Swedish Council for Building Research.
Kollaros, G. (2016). LIQUID LIMIT VALUES OBTAINED BY DIFFERENT TESTING METHODS. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, 50(2), 778-787.
Leroueil, S., & Le Bihan, J.-P. (1996). Liquid limits and fall cones. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 33(5), 793-798.
Littleton, I., & Farmilo, M. (1977). Some observations on liquid limit values with reference to penetration and Casagrande tests. Ground Engineering, 10(Analytic).
Medhat, F., & Whyte, I. (1986). An appraisal of soil index tests. Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications, 2(1), 317-323.
Mishra, A. K., Ohtsubo, M., Li, L., & Higashi, T. (2011). Controlling factors of the swelling of various bentonites and their correlations with the hydraulic conductivity of soil-bentonite mixtures. Applied Clay Science, 52(1-2), 78-84.
Özer, M. (2009). Comparison of liquid limit values determined using the hard and soft base Casagrande apparatus and the cone penetrometer. Bulletin of engineering geology and the environment, 68(3), 289-296.
Sherwood, P., & Ryley, M. (1970). An investigation of a cone-penetrometer method for the determination of the liquid limit. Géotechnique, 20(2), 203-208.
Sivapullaiah, P. V., & Sridharan, A. (1985). Liquid limit of soil mixtures. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 8(3), 111-116.
Sowers, G., Vesić, A., & Grandolfi, M. (1960). Penetration tests for liquid limit. Paper presented at the Papers on Soils 1959 Meetings.
Spagnoli, G. (2012). Comparison between Casagrande and drop-cone methods to calculate liquid limit for pure clay. Canadian journal of soil science, 92(6), 859-864.
Wasti, Y., & Bezirci, M. (1986). Determination of the consistency limits of soils by the fall cone test. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 23(2), 241-246.
Wires, K. (1984). The Casagrande method versus the drop-cone penetrometer method for the determination of liquid limit. Canadian journal of soil science, 64(2), 297-300.
Published
2019-08-09
How to Cite
Hashim Ibrahim, H., and K. M-Gharrib Noori. “Determining Casagrande Liquid Limit Values from Cone Penetration Test Data”. ZANCO Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, Vol. 31, no. s3, Aug. 2019, pp. 114-20, doi:10.21271/ZJPAS.31.s3.16.