Clinical Diversity of Multiple Myeloma at the First Presentation through the Time Lapse to Diagnosis in Kurdistan Region, Iraq

  • Truska A. Amin MBChB, KBMS-candidate, Department of Hematology, Hiwa Cancer hospital, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Region, Iraq,
  • Zeki A. Mohamed MBChB, MRCP, FIBMS, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Duhok, Duhok, Kurdistan Region, Iraq,
Keywords: International Staging System (ISS); Kurdistan; Multiple myeloma; Time lapse

Abstract

 Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy of the plasma cells. The study aimed to know the clinical diversity of MM at presentation, the time lapse from the first symptoms to diagnosis, and the association of this time lapse with the International Staging System (ISS) of MM. This is a retrospective observational study that was performed on 176 patients who had MM and were admitted to Hiwa Hospital in Sulaimani, Nanakaly Hospital in Hawler, and Azadi Hematology - Oncology Center in Duhok, from October 2010 to December 2019. Demographic and detailed clinical features were recorded, and the ISS of MM was used to assess possible effects of time lapse on patients’ outcomes. The mean ± SD (standard deviation) of patients’ age was 60.58 ± 11.54 years, and the majority of the patients (52.27%) were from Sulaimani. Most of them had an O+ blood group and a body mass index (BMI) of more than normal (30.68%, and 63.63%, respectively). Most of the patients had bone pain, ≥2 lytic lesions, hypocalcemia and hypercalcemia, and renal impairment and stage II and III of ISS of MM at the time of diagnosis (78.98%, 32.39%, 49.43%, 89.77%, and 75.1%, respectively). Furthermore, their mean ± SD of time lapse from the first symptom to diagnosis was 3.01 ± 3.18 months, and its association with ISS was none significant. The clinical features of MM at diagnosis are mostly nonspecific, and may be shared by a wide range of clinical conditions. However, patients who have fatigue, bone pain, renal impairment, pallor, and infective events should arouse the clinical suspicion of MM.

References

Byun JM, Kim D, Shin DY, Kim I, Koh Y, Yoon SS. Combination of Genetic Aberration With International Staging System Classification for Stratification of Asian Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation. In Vivo. 2019;33(2):611-619.

Chowdhury RK. A Clinical and Laboratory Profile of Multiple Myeloma. J Enam Med Col.
2018;8(3):159-64.

Eslick R, Talaulikar D. Multiple myeloma: from diagnosis to treatment. Aust Fam Physician. 2013;42(10):684-8.

Friese CR, Abel GA, Magazu LS, Neville BA, Richardson LC, Earle CC. Diagnostic delay and complications for older adults with multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2009;50(3):392-400.

Goldschmidt N, Zamir L, Poperno A, Kahan NR, Paltiel O. Presenting Signs of Multiple Myeloma and the Effect of Diagnostic Delay on the Prognosis. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016;29(6):702-9.

Howell DA, Hart RI, Smith AG, Macleod U, Patmore R, Cook G, et al. Myeloma: Patient accounts
of their pathways to diagnosis. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(4): e0194788.
Howell DA, Smith AG, Jack A, Patmore R, Macleod U, Mironska E, et al. Time-to-diagnosis and symptoms of myeloma, lymphomas and leukaemias: a report from the Haematological Malignancy Research Network. BMC Hematol. 2013;13(1):9.

Hussain A, Almenfi HF, Almehdewi AM, Hamza MS, Bhat MS, Vijayashankar NP. Laboratory Features of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients. Cureus. 2019 May 22;11(5):e4716.

Ino-Ekanem MB, Ekwere TA, Ekanem AM. The Frequency and Distribution of ABO Blood Groups in Patients with Haematological Cancers in Uyo, Nigeria: A Hospital Based Retrospective Study. IBRR, 8(3): 1-8, 2018; Article no.IBRR.42665.

Koshiaris C, Oke J, Abel L, Nicholson BD, Ramasamy K, Van den Bruel A. Quantifying intervals to diagnosis in myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2018;8(6):e019758.

Li J, Wang Y, Liu P. The impact on early diagnosis and survival outcome of M-protein screening-driven diagnostic approach to multiple myeloma in China: a cohort study. J Cancer. 2019;10(20):4807-4813.

Neal RD, Tharmanathan P, France B, Din NU, Cotton S, Fallon-Ferguson J, et al. Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? Systematic review. Br J Cancer. 2015;112 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S92-107.

Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma: 2018 update on diagnosis, risk‐stratification, and management.
Am J Hematol. 2018;93(8):981-1114.

Shephard EA, Neal RD, Rose P, Walter FM, Litt EJ, Hamilton WT. Quantifying the risk of multiple myeloma from symptoms reported in primary care patients: a large case-control study using electronic records. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(631):e106-13.

Wallin A, Larsson SC. Body mass index and risk of multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(11):1606-15.

Willrich MA, Katzmann JA. Laboratory testing requirements for diagnosis and follow-up of multiple myeloma and related plasma cell dyscrasias. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54(6):907-19.

Wilson JA, Jacobs A. ABO discrepancy in a multiple myeloma patient: a case study. Clin Lab Sci 2002;15(4):204-7.

World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory (GHO) data; Life expectancy. Available from:https://www.who.int/gho/mortality_burden_disease/life_tables/situation_trends_text/en/. [Accessed July 26, 2020].
Published
2020-12-20
How to Cite
Amin, T. and Mohamed, Z. (2020) “Clinical Diversity of Multiple Myeloma at the First Presentation through the Time Lapse to Diagnosis in Kurdistan Region, Iraq”, Zanco Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 32(6), pp. 87-99. doi: 10.21271/ZJPAS.32.6.10.
Section
Biology and Medical Researches