Realisation of Constituents in English and Kurdish
This study entitled "Realisation of constituents in English and Kurdish languages" focuses on the definitions of constituent then on some ways by which they are realized. It shows the words that form constituents . It indicates that one word or more can be a constituent. The problem here is that learners are unable to realise constituent and its type in a sentence .This is due to their lack of knowledge about phrases and their functions .So a constituent can be defined as some word plus all the words depending on it, either directly or indirectly .In other words, that word plus all the dependency chains lead up to it. These constituents have various functions hinging upon the positions they occur in sentences. Here ,the immediate and ultimate constituents are dealt with too. The aim of this study is not to show the functions but would rather show the tests that make readers be sure that a part is a constituent. These tests may or may not vary in each language. In Kurdish language mainly,the types of constituent (immediate ,intermediate and ultimate) are dealt with too. In this study, the tests that are indicated for establishing constituent are shown in both English and Kurdish languages. The most widely used tests for constituents in syntax are : topicalization, proform substitution , fragments , clefting , vp-ellipsis ,pseudo clefting .The significance of the research lies in the fact that different other topics are dealt with for dealing with this subject. Readers or learners can benefit from them ,for example, types of constituents ,proform, clefting ,….in case their researches are about one of these topics. Finally,It is concluded that for a part to be a constituent, it should not meet all the tests or conditions of constituents. But if it meets one or two condition(s)or tests, it would be considered a constituent. In English there are many tests that assure us that a part is a constituent but in Kurdish there are not many tests for this purpose. In both languages ,the same types of constituents ;immediate ,intermediate and the ultimate are realized and identified.
1.Anon. 2003. SIL International
2.Bussmann,H.(1996).Routledge Dictionary of language and Linguistics. Thomson publishing company.
3.Crystal,David.(2003).A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics.5th ed. UK
4.Fattah,M.M.(1997) A Generative Grammar of Kurdish ph d dissertation Amsterdam university
5.Hageman,Lilian(1998). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Reprinted ,2nd ed. Oxford: Black well
6.Huddleston, Rodney (1984) .Introduction to Grammar of English .Cambridge university press
7. Nordquist, Richard. (2019)"Constituent: Definition and Examples in Grammar." ThoughtCo.
8.Radford.A. (2012).An Introduction to English Sentence Structure. Cambridge University press. USA
9. Starosta ,S. 1988. The Case for Lexicase: An Outline of Lexicase Grammatical Theory. Pinter Publishers, London
10.Stork and Hartmann.(1971).Dictionary of Language and Linguistics . Applied science publishers, Great Britain
1.Bakir Omer Ali(1992) Bastnu krtandn la kurdida .MA thesis College of Arts Salahaddin University-Hawler
2.Mhamad Mahwy and Narmin Omer .(2004).Modeli Rezmanyy Kurdy .Slemany ,Zheer printing press
3.Mhamad Mahwy (2001) Rstasazy Kurdy .Slemany
Copyright (c) 2021 Dilovan Sayfuddin Saady, Hatam Wlya Muhammad, Lecturer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
At Zanco Journal, we're dedicated to protecting your rights as an author, and ensuring that any and all legal information and copyright regulations are addressed. Whether an author is published with Zanco Journal or any other publisher, we hold ourselves and our colleagues to the highest standards of ethics, responsibility and legal obligation