Sociological Perspectives on Scientific Knowledge A theoretical study in the field of sociology of knowledge
توێژینەوەیەکی تیۆرییە لە بواری کۆمەڵناسی مەعریفە
Since the second half of the twentieth century, science as a kind of knowledge, as well as a social institution, became the subject of research from a sociological point of view, and especially through the sociology of knowledge. One of the main theses this field from the beginning is that knowledge is socially produced and inherited. Science in itself refers to a systematic and organized structure of knowledge in any field of inquiry by the use of the scientific method. The position and role of science in societies is constantly changing. These changes are valuable in two ways: first, in terms of how science defines knowledge; Second, how knowledge and scientific knowledge are linked to the totality of other systems and strutures of society. Delivering knowledge to the public and making it part of social awareness will be through a process called popularization of science and this will require a special method of mixing with social and cultural elements. The main purpose of this study is to provide a theoretical review of the literature produced in the field of sociology of knowledge on scientific knowledge. The research method is a descriptive-analytical method. The main result of this study is: no kind of knowledge will be created and disseminated without regarding of its social aspects. Moreover, the social realities themselves are the product of different knowledge, meaning that there is no social reality that does not have a specific knowledge.
2- Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. 1966. The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
3- Bhattacherjee, A., 2012. Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices.2nd ed. University of South Florida. Florida.
4- Bird, A. (2010). Social knowing: The social sense of'scientific knowledge'. Philosophical Perspectives, 24, 23-56.
5- Bowler, P.J., 2009. Science for all: the popularization of science in early twentieth-century Britain. University of Chicago Press.
6- Calhoun, C. (Ed.). (2010). Robert K. Merton: Sociology of science and sociology as science. Columbia University Press. New york
7- Chawg Blog (2017) Science and scintifc awarenss. https://chawg.org/podcastt/babeti136.html#more-136.
8- Downes, S. M. (1993), "Socializing Naturalized Philosophy of Science", Philosophy of Science 60: 452-468.
9- Edgerton, D., 2004. The linear model’did not exist: Reflections on the history and historiography of science and research in industry in the twentieth century. The science-industry nexus: History, policy, implications, pp.31-57.
10- Gieryn, T. F. (2010). Paradigm for the Sociology of Science. Merton, RK: Sociology of Science and Sociology as Science, 113-139. Columbia University Press. New York
11- Goodell, R., 1977. The visible scientists. The Sciences, 17(1), pp.6-9.
12- Gregory, J., & Miller, S. (1998). Science in public: Communication, culture, and credibility. Plenum Press.
13- Holyoak, K. J. and P. Thagard 1997. The analogical mind. American Psychologist 52:35-44.
14- Jeevan, V.K.J., 2008. Science awareness through public libraries in India
15- Kalam, A. A. (2002). Dimensions of Knowledge Society. India International Centre Quarterly, 29(2), 39-49.
16- Lawrence Neuman, W. (2014). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson. Essex.
17- Lewenstein, B.V., 1995. From fax to facts: Communication in the cold fusion saga. Social Studies of Science, 25(3), pp.403-436
18- Longino, H.E., 1990. Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press.
19- McCarthy, E. D. (1996). Knowledge as culture: The new sociology of knowledge. Psychology Press. New York.
20- McNeil, M., 2013. Between a rock and a hard place: The deficit model, the diffusion model and publics in STS. Science as Culture, 22(4), pp.589-608.
21- Mendelsohn, E. (1977). The social construction of scientific knowledge. In The social production of scientific knowledge (pp. 3-26). Springer, Dordrecht.
22- Mulkay, M.J., 1979. Science and the Sociology of Knowledge.Routledge, London.
23- Nowotny, H., Purity, S. and Danger, N., The Case of Risk Assessment'. The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge (Dordrecht/Boston, Mass.: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1977), pp.243-64.
24- P.A.T., Chan, K.M.A., and Porder, S. 2006. Bridge over a philosophical divide. Evidence & Policy. 2(2):251-257.
25- Paul, D., 2004. Spreading chaos: The role of popularizations in the diffusion of scientific ideas. Written communication, 21(1), pp.32-68.
26- Popper, Karl. "The sociology of knowledge." Knowledge: critical concepts. V: sociology of knowledge and science. New York: Routledge (2005): 63-74.
27- Ren, F. and Zhai, J., 2013. Communication and popularization of science and technology in China. Springer Science & Business Media.
28- Shapere, D., 1984. Scientific theories and their domains. In Reason and the Search for Knowledge (pp. 273-319). Springer, Dordrecht.
29- Shapin, S., 1995. Here and everywhere: Sociology of scientific knowledge. Annual review of sociology, 21(1), pp.289-321.
30- Shapiro, A.R., 2012. Between training and popularization: Regulating science textbooks in secondary education. Isis, 103(1), pp.99-110.
31- Stehr, N. (2009). Useful Scientific Knowledge: What is Relevant Science for Society? Journal of Applied Social Science, 3(1), 18-26.
32- Sturgis, P. and Allum, N., 2004. Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public understanding of science, 13(1), pp.55-74.
33- Thorlindsson, T., & Vilhjalmsson, R. (2003). Introduction to the special issue: Science, knowledge and society. Acta Sociologica, 46(2), 99-105.
34- Topuniversity (2021) Destination Guides Study in Egypt https://rb.gy/nthgza
35- W Lawrence, N., 2014. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches.7th ed. Pearson Education Limited. Essex.
36- Wang, L., & Ma, W. F. (2012). Scientific knowledge and extended epistemic virtues. Erkenntnis, 77(2), 273-295.
37- Wessels, B (2017). Definig knowledge society in: Open data and the knowledge society. Amsterdam University Press. Amsterdam
38- Wilson, R. A. 2005. Collective memory, group minds, and the extended mind thesis. Cognitive Processing 6: 227-36.
39- Yi, S., & Choi, J. (2012). The organization of scientific knowledge: the structural characteristics of keyword networks. Scientometrics, 90(3), 1015-1026.
40- Zhou Mengpu, & Song Ying. (2007). Science of science popularization [M]. Sichuan Science and Technology Press.
41- میران، رشاد (٢٠١٠) چەند بابەتێکی ئێتنۆ- کۆمەڵایەتی. دەزگای توێژینەوە و بڵاوکردنەوەی موکریانی. هەولێر
Copyright (c) 2021 Abdulsamih Muhammed Rahman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
At Zanco Journal, we're dedicated to protecting your rights as an author, and ensuring that any and all legal information and copyright regulations are addressed. Whether an author is published with Zanco Journal or any other publisher, we hold ourselves and our colleagues to the highest standards of ethics, responsibility and legal obligation